<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: cfix 1.3.0 Released, Introducing WinUnit Compatibility</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jpassing.com/2009/03/03/cfix-130-released-introducing-winunit-compatibility/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jpassing.com/2009/03/03/cfix-130-released-introducing-winunit-compatibility/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 22:49:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jpassing</title>
		<link>http://jpassing.com/2009/03/03/cfix-130-released-introducing-winunit-compatibility/#comment-863</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jpassing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 11:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jpassing.wordpress.com/?p=213#comment-863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It depends on the command line you are using. Say the DLL is named foo.dll, then:

&quot;cfix32 foo.dll&quot; should yield:
cfix version 1.3.0.3340 (fre)
(C) 2008-2009 - Johannes Passing - http://www.cfix-testing.org/
The specified module could not be found.

...which is caused by the unsatisfied dependency.

If, however, you specify a wildcard or a directory, like &quot;cfix32 *.dll&quot; or &quot;cfix32 .&quot;, foo.dll will silently be skipped and the output may be empty. This behavior is correct -- but indeed, it would be better if an appropriate error message would be output in this case, too.

If you have further questions, please drop me a mail: passing at users dot sourceforge dot net]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It depends on the command line you are using. Say the DLL is named foo.dll, then:</p>
<p>&#8220;cfix32 foo.dll&#8221; should yield:<br />
cfix version 1.3.0.3340 (fre)<br />
(C) 2008-2009 &#8211; Johannes Passing &#8211; <a href="http://www.cfix-testing.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.cfix-testing.org/</a><br />
The specified module could not be found.</p>
<p>&#8230;which is caused by the unsatisfied dependency.</p>
<p>If, however, you specify a wildcard or a directory, like &#8220;cfix32 *.dll&#8221; or &#8220;cfix32 .&#8221;, foo.dll will silently be skipped and the output may be empty. This behavior is correct &#8212; but indeed, it would be better if an appropriate error message would be output in this case, too.</p>
<p>If you have further questions, please drop me a mail: passing at users dot sourceforge dot net</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kmmbvnr</title>
		<link>http://jpassing.com/2009/03/03/cfix-130-released-introducing-winunit-compatibility/#comment-862</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kmmbvnr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 10:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jpassing.wordpress.com/?p=213#comment-862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a problem with cfix.

I have tests that statically linked with some DLL only present on Vista.

I thought if i run it on Windows XP, cfix tell me that some dll is missing. But when i run it - it just does not found any tests, and doesn&#039;t report on any error.

The output is:

  &gt;&gt; cfix version 1.3.0.3340 (fre)
  &gt;&gt; (C) 2008-2009 - Johannes Passing - http://www.cfix-testing.org/
  &gt;&gt;   .

Thats all. Is it correct behaviour for cfix?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a problem with cfix.</p>
<p>I have tests that statically linked with some DLL only present on Vista.</p>
<p>I thought if i run it on Windows XP, cfix tell me that some dll is missing. But when i run it &#8211; it just does not found any tests, and doesn&#8217;t report on any error.</p>
<p>The output is:</p>
<p>  &gt;&gt; cfix version 1.3.0.3340 (fre)<br />
  &gt;&gt; (C) 2008-2009 &#8211; Johannes Passing &#8211; <a href="http://www.cfix-testing.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.cfix-testing.org/</a><br />
  &gt;&gt;   .</p>
<p>Thats all. Is it correct behaviour for cfix?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

